Mailing-List: contact user-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ingmar.kliche@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.198.250 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=Xv4a7t12ESTDsecGrB9+C49foHFvHXahdaei9ERTmgTUftnGCNxDLljJ33PCe2c9G2
         bAmqZ75UFPztLvUQRmBaz9kyCZI9XKoVOMTQukj3+BiqZfzAZev261hq1XXEKB1ad2V2
         /vI25VJUL6eBClfGaHw0F5K+0r0DaHgI+NRZo=
Message-ID: <cc9610990812200752k7a75c24ft8b66533d79825581@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:52:00 +0100
From: "Ingmar Kliche" <ingmar.kliche@googlemail.com>
To: "Commons Users List" <user@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: BSF? (Re: [SCXML] Javascript as expression language
In-Reply-To: <494830F7.30709@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_21318_12175546.1229788320388"
References: <44cb1ba30812161013m29a6a78fkdf2d33c022fa151c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <cc9610990812161027j7a621654i752f800fbbbf92bc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <494830F7.30709@apache.org>

------=_Part_21318_12175546.1229788320388
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Rony,
we used the native Rhino API. Would be interesting to see if BSF is useful
for an integration with commons-SCXML. Does BSF separate out context and
evaluator?

- Ingmar.

2008/12/16 Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) <rony@apache.org>

> Hi Ingmar,
>
> how did that get implemented?
>
> Did you use by any chance BSF <http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf>? If so,
> then not only JavaScript/Rhino would be available, but any of the
> supported scripting languages!
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
> Ingmar Kliche wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite
> > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified.
> > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like
> test
> > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season) it
> > should be available.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ingmar.
> >
> > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <roger.hoover@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML
> Common
> >> with Rhino?  Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache
> >> license
> >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license?
> >>
> >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to
> >> implement externally and do others have interest in it?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Roger
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>

------=_Part_21318_12175546.1229788320388--