commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ingmar Kliche" <ingmar.kli...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: BSF? (Re: [SCXML] Javascript as expression language
Date Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:52:00 GMT
Hi Rony,
we used the native Rhino API. Would be interesting to see if BSF is useful
for an integration with commons-SCXML. Does BSF separate out context and
evaluator?

- Ingmar.

2008/12/16 Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) <rony@apache.org>

> Hi Ingmar,
>
> how did that get implemented?
>
> Did you use by any chance BSF <http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf>? If so,
> then not only JavaScript/Rhino would be available, but any of the
> supported scripting languages!
>
> ---rony
>
>
>
> Ingmar Kliche wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite
> > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified.
> > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like
> test
> > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season) it
> > should be available.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ingmar.
> >
> > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <roger.hoover@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML
> Common
> >> with Rhino?  Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache
> >> license
> >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license?
> >>
> >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to
> >> implement externally and do others have interest in it?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Roger
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message