commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel PILLANT" <epill...@sii.fr>
Subject Re: Hi SCXML community !
Date Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:49:59 GMT
Ok Rahul.
We will continue to use the digest() method, until the version 1.0 is
released.

Thank you very much for your answer.

Manu


On 27/02/2008, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/26/08, Emmanuel PILLANT <epillant@sii.fr> wrote:
> > Hi guys !
> >
> >  I want first congrats you for SCXML, which is a very usefull tool.
> >
> >  We are currently using the version 0.7, and i have a question about the
> use
> >  of the "digester" with SCXML. Into your tests, you are using the method
> >  digest(), but this method is deprecated. The javadoc indicates that we
> must
> >  use the method parse() instead but this is not working.
> >
> >  Do I need to use the method digest() or can I use parse() method ? And
> if
> >  the method parse() can be used, what must I change in my SCXML file to
> make
> >  this method works ?
> >
>
> <snip/>
>
> The digest() methods will not be removed until v1.0 (whenever that
> release happens -- no plan yet). So there isn't an immediate urgency
> to use to new parser. Many tests use the deprecated methods since we
> still need to test the old parser.
>
> The deprecation is a gentle reminder to begin to upgrade (older
> versions of) SCXML documents in line with the current version of the
> W3C WD:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-scxml-20070221/
>
> Once that is done, the new parser can be used.
>
> For specific answers about the bits not working when you make the
> change, please post brief and relevant SCXML snippets.
>
> -Rahul
>
>
>
> >  Thank's for your help.
> >
> >  Manu
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message