commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Bell" <jason.b...@e-gineering.com>
Subject RE: Commons Validator and Annotations
Date Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:41:36 GMT
Well, yes, of course.

However, that javascript is generated via a custom tag (which brings us back to Java).  The
tag reads the config from the xml file.  And back to my original question - has anyone attempted
(or knows of another project) which instead determines the config based on annotations rather
than an XML file?  I can go ahead and do it, but would rather not reinvent the wheel if it's
already out there some where.

Cheers,
Jason  



-----Original Message-----
From: apacheben@gmail.com on behalf of Ben Speakmon
Sent: Wed 1/2/2008 4:19 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Users List
Subject: Re: Commons Validator and Annotations
 
Client-side means browser, which means javascript, right? In that case, it's
not even Java anymore.

On Jan 2, 2008 1:13 PM, Jason Bell <jason.bell@e-gineering.com> wrote:

> We want to use the client-side validation aspect of Commons Validator.
>  We're using it in other webapps, but in our newest endeavor, we'd like to
> centralize the config info.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: apacheben@gmail.com on behalf of Ben Speakmon
> Sent: Wed 1/2/2008 4:12 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Users List
> Subject: Re: Commons Validator and Annotations
>
> If you already have annotations at your hibernate layer to do validation,
> why do you want to do it again somewhere else? Or are you talking about
> validating different data than what gets stuffed into hibernate?
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 12:40 PM, Jason Bell <jason.bell@e-gineering.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm looking to skip the xml configuration of validation and instead read
> > the rules from annotations.  We're using hibernate objects throughout
> the
> > app, even for the form.  And we're using annotations to configure all of
> the
> > hibernate goodness.  So, we'd like to just go ahead and use these
> > annotations to build our validation - maxlengths, number formats,
> required,
> > etc.  Has anyone out there done this (or know of an open source project
> that
> > has)?
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jason
> >
>
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message