On 27.11.2007, at 16:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov 25, 2007 5:45 PM, Mark Fortner <phidias51@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It might be better to simply maintain it as a VFS plugin since VFS
>> supports
>> other file systems as well as WebDAV. It would give people a
>> single place
>> to go, rather than to fragment support for different file systems
>> amongst
>> different projects within Apache.
>
> Many use cases for the WebDAV client library go beyond the feature set
> exposed by the VFS interface, so it's better to have a more generic
> WebDAV client library that VFS then uses to provide a file system
> abstraction.
+1
A webdav implementation is out of scope of VFS IMO.
cheers
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
|