David J. Biesack wrote on Monday, October 08, 2007 4:40 PM:
>> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:23:59 +0200
>> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?=
> <Joerg.Schaible@Elsag-Solutions.com>
>>
>> David J. Biesack wrote on Monday, October 08, 2007 3:02 PM:
>>
>>>> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 23:31:19 -0500
>>>> From: "Qingtian Wang" <qingtian.wang@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Well, it's pick-your-poison kind of a deal. Either block on one
>>>> instance and take a performance hit, or burn up the memory with
>>>> lots of instances.....
>>>
>>> Why not compromise? Create a ThreadPoolExecutor ...
>>
>> Because it runs on JDK 1.3?
>
> The java.util.concurrent backport
> http://backport-jsr166.sourceforge.net/ runs on 1.3, for just this
> kind of use.
I know this, but I doubt that we wanna start to depend Apache common components on it ;-)
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
|