commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <>
Subject Re: codec - thread safe
Date Sun, 07 Oct 2007 10:41:26 GMT
On 07/10/2007, simon <> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 23:31 -0500, Qingtian Wang wrote:
> > Well, it's pick-your-poison kind of a deal. Either block on one
> > instance and take a performance hit, or burn up the memory with lots
> > of instances.....
> >
> > But in the case of BCodec, I think encode/decode is thread safe.
> > Unfortunately per Henri, that's not generally true for others.
> >
> > Well, let me make it clear that I am a total layman on codec. But it
> > seems to me it's not that difficult to implement all the codec methods
> > in a thread safe manner, without sync blocks.
> >
> > Can the dev team make that happen? - a humble request from a user.
> The think about open source is that there is no distinction between
> developer and user. The developers develop because they want to use the
> code. And when somebody wants to use a feature that doesn't exist, then
> they can develop it.
> In short, if you want this feature, you can do this yourself and post a
> patch to this list so it gets included in the next release. There is no
> paid "dev team" for any of the commons code.

Might be better to create a JIRA issue and attach the patch to that:
* others can easily see that the issue has been reported
* patches can get mangled when posted to lists, and are more difficult
to keep track of.

For Codec, start here:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message