Mailing-List: contact commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <commons-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <45A33CF5.5050206@tbee.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:57:57 +0100
From: Tom <tbee@tbee.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jakarta Commons Users List <commons-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Commons Pool.. anyone using?
References: <20070109014344.1035895146@mail.digipixart.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070109014344.1035895146@mail.digipixart.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've been using commons pool a lot for the last years and found that 
with "infinite" objects it works perfectly (so a pool factory that keeps 
generating new objects, the effective maximum is managed by the pool). 
However with a limited pool it does not work (for example 3 named 
services, which might be the case when using SOAP): I've posted examples 
here that show that the current implementation goes into an infinite 
loop, but I don't know if that was fixed by now. This however forced me 
to write an alternative implementation based on the same interfaces.

Tom


Barrie Selack wrote:
> I was looking at Commons Pool for some SOAP/HTTP connection objects. Is
> anyone using Pool/ Any hint/tips/warnings etc?
>
> Regards,
> barrie
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org