Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64261 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2006 18:23:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2006 18:23:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 89485 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2006 18:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 89409 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2006 18:23:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Users List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 89394 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2006 18:23:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:23:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [64.52.119.68] (HELO postal.zedak.com) (64.52.119.68) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:23:31 -0700 Received: from Jared (unknown [192.168.41.38]) by postal.zedak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC8713EDC for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:25:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jared Graber" To: "'Jakarta Commons Users List'" Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release [net] version 2.0 Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:23:09 -0400 Message-ID: <017901c6d373$d66a0550$2629a8c0@ad.zedak.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Thread-Index: AcbTZ14SXA759HEaRBO5/cACT5/WqQAC6lew In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I think that would cause problems for a lot of people that still develop using Java 1.4 unless there were just different versions of the library for different versions of java. Unfortunately many companies in the corporate world use older Application Servers (even for new projects). I think it is necessary at this time to have a version of the library that isn't dependant upon Java 1.5. -Jared -----Original Message----- From: jieryn@gmail.com [mailto:jieryn@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 12:51 PM To: Jakarta Commons Users List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release [net] version 2.0 > I would like to gauge support for a release of Commons::Net 2.0. The > major changes are: Is there any plans to move to java.util.Collection classes? Specifically, I'd love to see us move away from the FTPFile [] type things in favor of Collection. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org