commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dion Gillard" <dion.gill...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ?
Date Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:06:30 GMT
Possible, yes.

Assignment in Jexl 1.0 is legal, parsed successfully, but does nothing.

On 4/19/06, Hans Gilde <hgilde@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> JSP has multiple ways to do variable assignment (similar to using tags
> versus Jexl) and people seem to handle picking the right one.
>
> Would it be possible, though, to break some existing code that
> accidentally
> has an assignment that is not currently processed? From a couple of tests,
> it doesn't seem to me that this would be a problem.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 3:55 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Users List
> Subject: [jelly] Re: Jelly to use new Jexl ?
>
> I have to say that I'd rather say it's good for jelly to have these
> features available.
> Loops shouldn't be a poblem.
>
> As for assignments, as far as I know, jelly always makes the context as
> a member so that assignment is not disabled. It could be an issue to
> folks who clear the context variable of the context.
> Does anyone do so ?
>
> paul
>
>
> Dion Gillard wrote:
> > There are things in the new release of Jexl that Jelly may or may not
> > want to pick up, e.g. assignment to variables, foreach/while
> > statements etc.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message