commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Markus Härnvi <j...@harnvi.net>
Subject Re: [betwixt] Suppress the use of BeanInfo in introspection
Date Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:42:32 GMT

Hi Martin!


Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> That would be fine..
> Nice to see people from Sri Lanka active :)
> I stayed with some catholic fathers in Ja-Ela (Colombo area) and 
> Mawatagama (at the childrens home) a couple of years ago and of course 
> also doing some really touristy stuff :)
>

I attached a new patch with a test case in Bugzilla.

I am from Sweden myself, but will work here in Colombo for a year in a 
startup company called Mazarin (http://www.mazarin.lk). We have some 
bright,  Sri Lankan programmers employed, and they really like working 
with Java, Open Source and Apache. I'm sure they will contribute to 
different projects in the coming years.

Sri Lanka is a beautiful place. I just hope they can stay away from 
civil war...

regards,

    /Markus


> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Markus Härnvi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martin!
>>
>> The day here is almost over (Colombo, GMT +6). :-)
>>
>> But I can write some tests tomorrow. I'll use the BeanWithBeanInfo 
>> stuff in TestXMLIntrospector and add some tests there.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>     /Markus
>>
>> Martin van den Bemt wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Markus,
>>>
>>> It looks good (just had a quick peek at the patch). Although 
>>> applying the patch will go faster if you have a testcase to go with 
>>> that. If you can have a testcase today, I will make some time 
>>> available to commit it (I am on GMT+1 btw).
>>>
>>> Mvgr,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> Markus Härnvi wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok.
>>>>
>>>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38310
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if it's ok.
>>>>
>>>>    /Markus
>>>>
>>>> Martin van den Bemt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It was originally intended for that usage scneario (specifically 
>>>>> to ignore the provided beaninfo's by Sun), since I didn't hit the 
>>>>> issue you are having now myself.
>>>>> Could you file an issue in bugzilla ?
>>>>> A patch is also appreciated, since I am pretty swamped with work 
>>>>> atm..
>>>>>
>>>>> Mvgr,
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>> Markus Härnvi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think it does what I want. It seems like the 
>>>>>> BeanInfoSearchPath is only used if the Introspector can't find a

>>>>>> BeanInfo class in the same package as the Bean. If it finds it in

>>>>>> the same package it will use even if BeanInfoSearchPath is empty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is from the Introspector Javadoc:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'For each class "Foo", explicit information may be available if 
>>>>>> there exists a corresponding "FooBeanInfo" class that provides a

>>>>>> non-null value when queried for the information. We first look 
>>>>>> for the BeanInfo class by taking the full package-qualified name

>>>>>> of the target bean class and appending "BeanInfo" to form a new 
>>>>>> class name. If this fails, then we take the final classname 
>>>>>> component of this name, and look for that class in each of the 
>>>>>> packages specified in the BeanInfo package search path. '
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     /Markus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martin van den Bemt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the introspectionConfiguration you can set the 
>>>>>>> useBeanInfoSearchPath to false..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mvgr,
>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Markus Härnvi wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We needed to add some BeanInfo classes to some beans in our

>>>>>>>> code. It seems like Betwixt uses them for introspection.
Is 
>>>>>>>> that correct?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there a way to tell Betwixt to ignore the *BeanInfo files

>>>>>>>> and only use Reflection and .betwixt files?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    /Markus
>>>>>>>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message