commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillermo Bares" <>
Subject Re: Can Betwixt/Digester directly access public data members w/ogetters/setters?
Date Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:56:43 GMT
I am definitely interested in adding support for fields.  If you have ideas 
of what the best way to go about it would be, I would greatly appreciate it. 
  T. Dudziak previously Thomas Dudziak that the SetPropertiesRule would be a 
good place to start.  While going through the source code I noticed that the 
SetPropertiesRule uses the BeanUtils' populate method to do the update.  
Would you see the field access using a similar/identical approach?

>From: robert burrell donkin <>
>Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <>
>To: Jakarta Commons Users List <>
>Subject: Re: Can Betwixt/Digester directly access public data members 
>Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:33:55 +0000
>On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 16:10 +0000, Guillermo Bares wrote:
> > 2) If there is no configuration mechanism, I am willing to extend the
> > Betwixt/Digester frameworks.  I have a couple ideas on where to start, 
>but I
> > would like to hear others.
>for various pretty obscure reasons, i intend to add support for fields
>soon. i've got a lot on ATM so i'm not sure when i'd get round to this
>but i'd be pleased to help you if you fancy developing a patch for
>betwixt  (if you're still interested).
>- robert
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>For additional commands, e-mail:

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message