commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Frank Ryan" <>
Subject Licensing discrepancy
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:38:16 GMT
While looking at the notice to be included when using any of the commons jar
files, it appears that there is a discrepancy that while not a major issue
may want to be corrected.  In the projects I have looked include the Apache
1.1 License while the commons site says everything is licensed under the
Apache 2.0 license.  Does anyone have any insight on this?

An example is the commons-dbcp               



  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message