commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Kitching <>
Subject Re: [beanutils] Unmaintained? was Re: [Commons] Unmaintained projects
Date Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:41:14 GMT
[AARGH -- I hate top-posting!]

Shawn (correctly) assumes BeanUtils is unmaintained because I said so. A
couple of months ago I saw that the bugzilla count on beanutils was over
80, and so I put out a request for people to help me get this addressed.
I got two offers of assistance: not a lot, but enough so I got stuck in.
However the two volunteers quickly vanished. I certainly didn't want to
be working on beanutils on my own so I have now stopped too. 

There are currently 82 bugzilla entries for beanutils, and no-one other
than myself has committed a patch for many months now.

That definitely qualifies as unmaintained.

Shawn: I did reply to your question:



A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?

On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 10:28 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
> Why do you assume that BeanUtils is unmaintained?
> On 7/22/05, Bernard, Shawn <> wrote:
> > I never got an answer to my below question, and I just saw the question about one
of the Sandbox projects.  Is there a list of unmaintained/abandoned Commons projects?  Is
there anything that this community can do about them?
> > 
> > -Shawn
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bernard, Shawn []
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:46 AM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Users List;
> > Subject: RE: [BeanUtils] Re: LazyDynaBean in a pojo
> > 
> > 
> > Is there any reason why BeanUtils is unmaintained?  Is it just waiting for a maintainer?
 Or is it being left to stagnate for a reason (i.e. Java 5).
> > 
> > -Shawn
> > 

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message