commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dion Gillard <>
Subject Re: [Jelly] Executable XML vs. Rich Configuration
Date Thu, 19 May 2005 00:33:53 GMT
On 5/19/05, Dan Madoni <> wrote:
> I can actually go along with the explanation of Jelly being molded into any
> shape, although that's a bit of a stretch of the word "Jelly", as people
> don't really think of jelly as something you mold around something else.
> That is, I'll put jelly on my toast, but it's not the first thing I think of
> when I need something flexible and moldable like clay or Silly Putty.
> I should note at this point that I'm American, and the suggestion that
> British "Jelly"--our "Jello"--being moldable makes much more sense, as it is
> very common to mold Jello; but "jelly" and "Jello" have no implied
> connection here.

Come on, you're only American, if that's causing a problem for you,
what about the rest of the world that doesn't even speak English!


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message