commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Catalin Grigoroscuta <>
Subject Re: [Jelly] Executable XML vs. Rich Configuration
Date Thu, 19 May 2005 06:40:08 GMT
Also, should keep in mind that if you use too much Jelly (or Jello, as 
other may preffer), it can get quite messy ;)
And, although it's very flexible and appealing, only kids like to play 
with it.

Dan Madoni wrote:

>Also Jelly (in British or Jello in American) can be molded to fit any shape
>required which kinda fits with Jelly's main aim to be a flexible Java and
>XML based scripting engine that can do anything. 

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message