# commons-user mailing list archives

##### Site index · List index
Message view
Top
From Mihael Knezevic <m.kneze...@porta.de>
Subject Re: [FileUpload] Getting wrong filename from FileItem
Date Fri, 06 May 2005 14:12:59 GMT
```got some time for the testing now.

my test env:
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 Sarge
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_06-b03, mixed mode)

my code:
System.out.println("-------- Test ----------");
System.out.println("Windows file name: " + new
File("C\\Windows\\Temp\\myfile.txt").getName());
System.out.println("Linux file name: " + new
File("/tmp/myfile.txt").getName());
System.out.println("-------- End  ----------");

my output:
-------- Test ----------
Windows file name: C:\Windows\Temp\myfile.txt
Linux file name: myfile.txt
-------- End  ----------

and it is as i expected. it takes the local file separator which is not in the
windows file name. so it returns the absolute file name IMO.

Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 09:54 schrieb Dakota Jack:
> I tested it out on both file separators (linux and microsoft) and it
> works on both.  Just run a test and see if it works.  It does
>
>
> public class Test {
>   public static void main(String [] params) {
>     File ie = new File("C:\\mydir\\myfile.txt");
>     File linux = new File("/mydir/myfile.txt");
>     StdOut.log("log.development","Test ttf ie.getName() = " + ie.getName());
>     StdOut.log("log.development","Test ttf linux.getName() = " +
> linux.getName());
> }
>
> You should just use System.out.println() of course.
>
>
> On 5/6/05, Knezevic, Mihael <m.knezevic@porta.de> wrote:
> > i can not figure out how this should work. this is a web application.
linux and windows clients are accessing the app. the filename can
be /mydir/myfile.txt and C:\mydir\myfile.txt. how should the server know
which file separator to use. hmm. i could take a look at the http request
data. ain't there a field for the operating system. but that ain't something
i like to do. these things are always changing.
> >
> > i'll try your code later. thanks.
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Dakota Jack [mailto:dakota.jack@gmail.com]
> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 09:34
> > > An: Jakarta Commons Users List
> > > Betreff: Re: [FileUpload] Getting wrong filename from FileItem
> > >
> > > This code should definitely work.  If it does not, I sure
> > > would like to know what happens.  What did happen?  Did you debug it?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/6/05, Knezevic, Mihael <m.knezevic@porta.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > Von: Dakota Jack [mailto:dakota.jack@gmail.com]
> > > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 08:51
> > > > > An: Jakarta Commons Users List; Knezevic, Mihael
> > > > > Betreff: Re: [FileUpload] Getting wrong filename from FileItem
> > > > >
> > > > > Just so there is no misunderstanding, the browsers have
> > > nothing to
> > > > > do with what getName returns.  The browsers differ in
> > > what name they
> > > > > provide for the file.  Thus, when you get a File object for IE it
> > > > > gives the full name and for the others the actual file
> > > name itself.
> > > > thanks for the extra explanation. it's what i understood in
> > > the first place (no offense on this one).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > You make them all the same if you change commonsupload to give you
> > > > > file,getName() rather than just file.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >     // Just add this to the "protected String getFileName(Map
> > > > >     if(fileName != null) {
> > > > >       fileName = new java.io.File(fileName).getName();
> > > > >     }
> > > >
> > > > tried that in the first place in my programm. but as the
> > > filename is something like C:\mydir\myfile.txt (windows file
> > > path) it doesn't seem to work on the linux server i'm
> > > running. file separators are different. correct me if i'm wrong.
> > > >
> > > > windows client (ie) returns C:\mydir\myfile.txt to my linux
> > > server. on linux the file separator is a slash ( / ) and not
> > > a backslash ( \ ). so my linux server searches for a slash in
> > > the full filename to get just the filename. but there is
> > > none. so it assumes it is the filename and returns it all.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/5/05, Mihael Knezevic <m.knezevic@porta.de> wrote:
> > > > > > thanks to all the responses for my question.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > actually i didn't know that it was a browser "thing". i
> > > > > thought it was
> > > > > > an operating system thing. thanks for clearing this up. and
> > > > > as this is
> > > > > > a browser specific thing IMHO there should be just a
> > > change in the
> > > > > > docu where you should add the fact that the IE is not behaving
> > > > > > like any other browser with the method getName. that would be
of
> > > > > much help.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and this is the kind of "feature" i don't like of MS software.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2005 22:02 schrieb Frank W. Zammetti:
> > > > > > > I know, I've run into this myself... But, it should
> > > be a fairly
> > > > > > > trivial exercise to write code to extract just the
> > > filename (as
> > > > > > > I believe you've done).  This makes sense to me as an
> > > > > > > method.  That way no existing code gets broken, but newer
> > > > > code can
> > > > > > > use the new method, which works as getName() probably should
> > > > > > > have been working all along anyway (IMHO).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Frank
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dakota Jack wrote:
> > > > > > > > The data difference is not in the code but in the
> > > request data
> > > > > > > > from the browser.  IE puts in the full name and other
> > > > > browsers put
> > > > > > > > in just the name.  Calling [file].getName() gives
the
> > > > > same result
> > > > > > > > for all of them.  I don't think there is a way to
get a
> > > > > full name
> > > > > > > > from the browsers that send only the file name.
> > > There is no
> > > > > > > > reason, of course, to know the full name.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/4/05, Frank W. Zammetti <fzlists@omnytex.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>It seems to me a method to get JUST the filename
makes
> > > > > a lot of sense...
> > > > > > > >>what has been the reason for not adding it IN ADDITION
> > > > > to what's
> > > > > > > >>there now?  Unfortunately it would make more sense
if
> > > > > > > >>getName() returned just the name while there was
another
> > > > > > > >>method, maybe
> > > > > > > >>getFullName() that returned what getName() returns
now,
> > > > > but that
> > > > > > > >>breaks existing code potentially, so I can certainly
> > > > > see why that
> > > > > > > >>hasn't been done, but adding something like
> > > getJustTheName()
> > > > > > > >>or something (obviously there must be a better
choice!)
> > > > > makes sense to me.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>Frank
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>Dakota Jack wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>>That is an excellent point, Robert.  I often
forget
> > > > > how horrible
> > > > > > > >>>it must be to be immeshed in those programming
worlds
> > > > > where there
> > > > > > > >>>is no recourse.  Too often we shy away, I think,
> > > at changing
> > > > > > > >>>code, even with the Java distribution itself,
> > > > > issues notwithstanding.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>On 5/4/05, robert burrell donkin
> > > > > > > >>><robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>>On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 10:26 -0700, Dakota
Jack wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>Some people think this is a bug and
some people
> > > > > think that this
> > > > > > > >>>>>is a feature.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>><snip>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>That is not a problem, however.  I
just went in and
> > > > > changed the
> > > > > > > >>>>>commons upload code adding .getName()
to the
> > > file at this
> > > > > > > >>>>>stage.  The problem you are seeing
is in
> > > Internet Explorer,
> > > > > > > >>>>>right?  Firefox and Netscape return
the file name
> > > > > and Internet
> > > > > > > >>>>>Explorer returns the full path.  Anyway,
you
> > > either have to
> > > > > > > >>>>>solve the problem in the commons upload
code itself,
> > > > > where it
> > > > > > > >>>>>is easy to solve, or to go through
some wasted
> > > > > mechanisms after
> > > > > > > >>>>>the fact.  Everyone has to solve this
problem
> > > > > somewhere, so I
> > > > > > > >>>>>definitely come down on the side of
"bug" versus
> > > "feature".
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>the great thing about open source is that
you are
> > > free to do
> > > > > > > >>>>exactly this :)
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>- robert
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float
> > > on its back."
> > > ~Dakota Jack~
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
> ~Dakota Jack~
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org