commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <>
Subject Re: Jelly and a new beta release
Date Thu, 09 Sep 2004 20:34:18 GMT
On 7 Sep 2004, at 21:16, Paul Libbrecht wrote:


> Btw, BeanUtils has had a refactoring started since jelly-beta-3 
> release (by Robert Burrell Donkin) and I know we could take advantage 
> of it into Jelly...

FWIW i think that it's not beanutils that's the problem but 
understanding what need it is satisfying in jelly. i'd recommend not 
going down the creation-a-homegrown-beanutils-replacement route since 
this has proved (in the past) to be very unlikely to produce anything 
much better but is likely to be a lot of work.

beanutils (surprisingly enough) isn't so slow (at least with the modern 
JVMs from sun). unless jelly's needs have been well analyzed, there a 
risk of losing quite a lot of functionality for minimal real life 
performance gain.

IMHO the real problem with beanutils is more a lack of flexibility, 
configurability and tunability (rather than straight speed). it may be 
that it'd be better for jelly to address these shortcomings by 
factoring out based on it's needs (rather than just ripping out 

- robert

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message