Mailing-List: contact commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <commons-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: <epugh@upstate.com>
From: "Eric Pugh" <epugh@upstate.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <commons-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [configuration] Can't get it to work properly
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 19:51:30 +0200
Message-ID: <PKENIMMEAHDAHILNLIJPAELGFHAB.epugh@upstate.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <410A42E5.2020400@med.uni-marburg.de>

Okay, I've removed the ConfigurationXMLDocument..  It was painful to do!  I
am working on a 1.0 RC1, so I'm taking the path of least resistence here.

Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Heger [mailto:hegero@med.uni-marburg.de]
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 2:45 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Users List
> Subject: Re: [configuration] Can't get it to work properly
>
>
> Eric,
>
> I have been thinking about this problem for a while, but I really don't
> see a way to get ConfigurationXMLDocument running with a reasonable
> amount of work. So I would opt for removing this class in the 1.0
> release and later add it again. I think, Emanuel is on the same opinion.
>
> I have made a suggestion for a more hierarchical design of
> [configuration], which can be found here:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=commons-dev@ja
> karta.apache.org&msgNo=52582
>
> This approach would make integration of ConfigurationXMLDocument
> very easy.
>
> Oliver
>
> Eric Pugh wrote:
>
> > Oliver,
> > do you know what changes need to be done to make
> ConfigurationXMLDocument
> > work?  Or do you think we should remove it for now, and get the
> 1.0 release
> > out, so we can start on 2.0 refactoring?
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Oliver Heger [mailto:hegero@med.uni-marburg.de]
> >>Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 7:53 AM
> >>To: Jakarta Commons Users List
> >>Subject: Re: [configuration] Can't get it to work properly
> >>
> >>
> >>Hello Marty,
> >>
> >>usage of ConfigurationXMLDocument is quite problematic ATM because there
> >>have been changes on other classes which brake this class. If you build
> >>[configuration] from the actual CVS sources, you will see that the unit
> >>tests for ConfigurationXMLDocument fail.
> >>
> >>Currently there is no easy solution for this problem. AFAIK it is planed
> >>that ConfigurationXMLDocument won't be part of the 1.0 release of
> >>[configuration] (which will come very soon hopefully). After that some
> >>refactoring and redesign will be performed which solve the problems.
> >>(Can somebody else confirm this or correct me?)
> >>
> >>What could help you with your actual problem is the following: If you
> >>have only one XML configuration file you have to process, you can load
> >>it directly using HierarchicalXMLConfiguration (and don't use
> >>ConfigurationFactory). If you then create a ConfigurationXMLDocument
> >>from this configuration, the resulting XML document will probably keep
> >>its structure and can be processed by Digester.
> >>
> >>Oliver
> >>
> [snip]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org