commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dion Gillard <dion.gill...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Date Tue, 24 Aug 2004 03:30:52 GMT
Yep, fixed that one in CVS. Should be in tonights binary.

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:34:18 +0900, Geoff Waggott <geoff@zergsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi again Dion,
> 
> Actually I'm a bit confused about by this.
> 
> In the course of writing the test program for the size problem I wrote
> tests for the string concatenation as well and they worked. In my tests
> for the my library using JEXL it doesn't. I am wrapping the JexlContext
> to hide the dependency on JEXL (in case I make the expression language
> puggable later). Using my wrapping class in a simple test program it
> still works!!!
> 
> I'll investigate further and try the latest version of JEXL from CVS.
> 
> The exception I get in the tests for my product looks like this:
> Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "Testing"
>         at
> java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
>         at
> java.lang.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(FloatingDecimal.java:1213)
>         at java.lang.Double.valueOf(Double.java:184)
>         at java.lang.Double.<init>(Double.java:259)
>         at
> org.apache.commons.jexl.util.Coercion.coerceDouble(Coercion.java:122)
>         at
> org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTAddNode.value(ASTAddNode.java:83)
>         at
> org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTExpression.value(ASTExpression.java:47)
>         at
> org.apache.commons.jexl.ExpressionImpl.evaluate(ExpressionImpl.java:83)
> 
> Anyway thanks again for your quick action on this.
> 
> Geoff
> 
> Dion Gillard wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:28 +0900, Geoff Waggott <geoff@zergsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
> >>Overall it seems very stable. There are a couple issues I've come across:
> >>- The overloaded + string concatenation operator only seems to work for
> >>string literals.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >The above bug was fixed and a test case added to ensure it stays fixed :-)
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> ===========================================================
> Geoff Waggott <geoff@zergsoft.com>
> ZergSoft
> Tel:   (052) 930-7790
> FAX:   (052) 930-7791
> email: geoff@zergsoft.com
> www.zergsoft.com
> ===========================================================
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message