Mailing-List: contact commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
In-Reply-To: <3F4A439E-C97B-11D7-8320-003065B86866@activemath.org>
To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <commons-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [jelly] Jelly needs a release   Was: jelly demos don't compile
 even
 with the jars
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: dion@multitask.com.au
Message-ID: 
 <OF1BE8A9D7.B5597E0A-ONCA256D7C.002F9BD3-CA256D7E.0083A570@multitask.com.au>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:01:24 +1000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="=_alternative 002F9EBECA256D7C_="

--=_alternative 002F9EBECA256D7C_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm a committer.....
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/


Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org> wrote on 08/08/2003 06:35:21 PM:

>=20
> On Vendredi, ao=FBt 8, 2003, at 10:07 Europe/Paris, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Jelly has no nightly build, which is odd as most of Commons does have=20
a
> > nightly build.
> >
> > It seems to me that Jelly should push out beta-4 if only so that a
> > buildable version is out there. Of course, there have been 689 commits
> > since that release, so I imagine the codebase might not be ready to=20
> > walk
> > out the door.
>=20
> As far as I know, there are at least problems with jelly-tags whose=20
> project.xml is outdated for maven b10 (tests don't run in the current=20
> project.xml, and some tests fail). Aside of documenation, of course,=20
> this is the only bit I know of.
>=20
> Also, the amount of comitters that are pingabble nowadays seems to be=20
> restricted to be Peter Royal...
>=20
> But it would be great to have nightly builds... clearly.
>=20
> Paul
>=20
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>=20

--=_alternative 002F9EBECA256D7C_=--