commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Libbrecht <>
Subject Re: Standalone Jelly without Maven
Date Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:51:51 GMT
Thakkar, Hetal wrote:
> I am trying to use Jelly for a data generation application that does not require Maven.
I can run standalone (without Maven) Jelly through a Java class as follows:
>     JellyContext context = new JellyContext();
>     context.runScript( resolveURL("script.xml"));
> Are there any short comings of using Jelly this way as opposed to using it in conjunction
with Maven?


I don't think there's any shortcomings except the obvious fact that you 
have to master the classpath yourself...


View raw message