commons-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anthony Eden ...@anthonyeden.com>
Subject Re: [jelly] Jelly and BSF?
Date Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:03:01 GMT
The advantage is to allow applications which use BSF to use Jelly 
without needing to code directly to the Jelly engine.

Sincerely,
Anthony Eden

Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> 
> On Dimanche, juil 13, 2003, at 15:33 Europe/Paris, Laird J. Nelson wrote:
> 
>> I'm not entirely sure of the ground I'm standing on here, but what would
>> it take to make Jelly a BSF-compliant scripting language?  Is that a
>> meaningful question?
> 
> 
> Looks very decent to me.
> What's more in a bsf connection than connecting some context and 
> providing bean access ?
> 
> The thing is, jelly already does behave in this way (addressing 
> bean-properties by names at least)... so what would be the advantage ?
> The startup/packaging ? (this is where, indeed, to me, jelly is a bit 
> painful)
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message