Return-Path: <b.public@limepark.se>
Mailing-List: contact commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list commons-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32540 invoked from network); 5 May 2003 09:29:56 -0000
Received: from mail2.netintense.se (HELO netmail2.netintense.com)
 (212.214.136.64)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 May 2003 09:29:56 -0000
Received: from limepark-bjorn [62.65.99.97] by netmail2.netintense.com
  (SMTPD32-7.04) id AF1F15F6008E; Mon, 05 May 2003 11:30:07 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= <b.public@limepark.se>
To: COMMON-USER <commons-user@jakarta.apache.org>
X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.64 (1120) - EVALUATION VERSION
X-URL: http://www.pocomail.com/
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 11:30:34 +0200
Message-ID: <200355113034.707540@limepark-bjorn>
Subject: [vfs] jdbc Filesystem
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi.
I'm wondering about the future jdbc filesystem.
Are there any thoughts how this is going to be implemented. and=
 are 
there any effort going in to this at the moment?

/Bj=F6rn