Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list commons-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 73036 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2003 02:01:00 -0000 Received: from mx4.ust.hk (143.89.13.26) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Apr 2003 02:01:00 -0000 Received: from cte0025 (dy111-095.ust.hk [143.89.111.95]) by mx4.ust.hk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3M215Z5055986 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:01:06 +0800 (HKT) From: "Willie Vu" To: "'Jakarta Commons Users List'" Subject: RE: [Jelly] [Submit] New HttpUnit Tags Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:01:10 +0800 Organization: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Message-ID: <005501c30873$0be368e0$5f6f598f@ust.hk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-reply-to: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N James, I've looked at Latka briefly. Its validators concept look unique and = flexible. It will be a great functional testing tool for not only HTTP/HTTPS. = Compared it with HttpUnit, HttpUnit is more focused on and mature for HTTP unit = testing. HttpUnit does a great job in modelling the objects such as buttons, = forms, links, etc that interacting with them is easy. It is currently missing = from Latka. I believe having a Jelly tag library for HttpUnit makes it more = valuable for developers to do unit testing. I'm open to the idea of having a single code base. Is it a bigger = question for Latka and HttpUnit? If Latka and HttpUnit deserve to be separate, = separate Jelly tag librarys make sense. -- Willie Vu =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: James Strachan [mailto:james_strachan@yahoo.co.uk]=20 > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 6:16 > To: Jakarta Commons Users List > Subject: Re: [Jelly] [Submit] New HttpUnit Tags >=20 >=20 > Hi Willie >=20 > I've not looked too closely at httpunit yet - but have you looked at =20 > Latka? It seems that Jelly httpunit tags and Latka;s Jelly tags are =20 > tackling a similar problem - I wonder if there's a way to merge the =20 > best bits of each into a single codebase? >=20 >=20 > On Thursday, April 17, 2003, at 02:01 am, Willie Vu wrote: >=20 > > Attached is a new tag library for HttpUnit (www.httpunit.org). It > > allows > > developers to create unit tests for web applications easily. > > > > -- > > Willie Vu > > >=20 > httpunit.zip>------------------------------------------------- > ---------=20 > > ----------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail:=20 > commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org >=20 > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org >=20 >=20