Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list commons-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26377 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 21:07:06 -0000 Received: from pacman.mweb.co.za (196.2.45.77) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 21:07:06 -0000 Received: from pta-dial-196-31-183-8.mweb.co.za ([196.31.183.8]:4569 helo=ServerMAIN) by pacman.mweb.co.za with smtp (Exim 4.01) id 18lEvf-0000YG-00; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 23:05:27 +0200 Message-ID: <000d01c2d791$adcf9f10$0100a8c0@ServerMAIN> From: "Schalk" To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" , References: Subject: Re: StringBuffer pools and why not to use them Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 23:06:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Honestly, these discussions are pointless and will acheive nothing. All you are acheiving at this point is turning this list into SPAM mail. Please stick to usefull discussions that will benefit Java and developers and leave your personal issues for chat rooms. Kind Regards � Schalk Neethling � Volume4.Development.Multimedia.Branding .emotionalize.conceptualize.visualize.realize Tel: +27125468436 Fax: +27125468436 email: schalk@volume4.co.za url: www.volume4.co.za ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Dunn" To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:03 PM Subject: RE: StringBuffer pools and why not to use them > Chris DuPrat > > prat [ prat ] > noun (plural prats) > > buttocks: the buttocks ( slang ) > > intransitive verb (past prat�ted, past participle prat�ted, present > participle prat�ting, 3rd person present singular prats) > > behave thoughtlessly or exasperatingly: to behave in an unintelligent way, > especially when this causes exasperation or leads to time-wasting ( insult ) > > > Heh. > > > Greg > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Duprat [mailto:christopher.duprat@wanadoo.fr] > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Users List > Subject: Re: StringBuffer pools and why not to use them > > > Wasting of time. You shouldn't have the idea of implementing a pool for such > objects because of their high availability. By adding another level you just > reach the performance issue which is critical for that kind of objects. > > You're an Idiot ;-) > http://www.pagetutor.com/idiot/idiot.html > > Cheers, > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lester Ward" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:19 PM > Subject: StringBuffer pools and why not to use them > > > > I was doing some performance tuning recently and thought to try pooling > > StringBuffers. I built a pool for them based on StackKeydObjectPool. Bad > > idea. Here is why: > > > > http://www.divnull.com/lward/personal/writing/stringpool.html > > > > Comments welcome. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org >