[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY23?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:commenttabpanel&focusedCommentId=16658475#comment16658475
]
Matt Juntunen commented on GEOMETRY23:

I picture the representation of an ndimensional vector as an ntuple as a matter of definition
and not implementation. The definitions of the vector operations depend on this representation.
For example, it's not possible to compute a dot product between two sets of spherical coordinates.
That's why I think the {{ofCartesian}} is unnecessary.
> Remove Euclidean Point Classes
> 
>
> Key: GEOMETRY23
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY23
> Project: Apache Commons Geometry
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Matt Juntunen
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pullrequestavailable
>
> Based on discussion of the current Point/Vector API in GEOMETRY14 and research into
other geometric libraries, I think we should remove the Euclidean Point?D classes and make
Vector?D also implement Point. This will end up being similar to the previous commonsmath
design but avoids the issue raised in MATH1284 since the Point and Vector interfaces are
not related. They just happen to be implemented by the same class, which we're calling Vector?D
since a vector can be used to indicate a point (by adding it to the origin).
> In the course of trying this out this design, I ended up removing 7 classes and simplifying
several methods. I think that's a good indicator that this is a good design choice.
>
> Pull request: https://github.com/apache/commonsgeometry/pull/15

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
