commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gilles (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (NUMBERS-65) "RootsOfUnity" vs "nthRoot"
Date Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:01:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16444021#comment-16444021
] 

Gilles commented on NUMBERS-65:
-------------------------------

bq. I think this is the one to use.

OK, let's keep that one and move on. :)

bq. expanded to handle a negative integer as going the other direction.

Will you update the implementation of {{nthRoot}} (and unit tests)?


> "RootsOfUnity" vs "nthRoot"
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUMBERS-65
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-65
>             Project: Commons Numbers
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: complex
>            Reporter: Gilles
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: API, delete, gsoc2018
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> There is partial overlap of functionality between class {{RootsOfUnity}} and method {{nthRoot}}
(in class {{Complex}}).
> The latter is more general (any complex number) but the former allows a negative argument
(to specify clockwise ordering).
> Also, the implementations are different; it should be checked which is more accurate
(and then account for possible performance trade-offs).
> API-wise, I think that we should keep {{nthRoot}} (and delete {{RootsOfUnity}}).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message