Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BD9200D5E for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:27:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 4F1DD160BF2; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F59C160C0D for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:27:04 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 99089 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2017 10:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 98828 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2017 10:27:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:27:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 372A11A044E for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:27:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id srvxPlV3YXFV for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 553525F39F for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 810C7E015E for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 395E221E7D for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:27:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bruno P. Kinoshita (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (IMAGING-205) Imaging (Apache Sanselan) produces "odd offsets" in (EXIF) metadata MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:27:05 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAGING-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16283314#comment-16283314 ] Bruno P. Kinoshita commented on IMAGING-205: -------------------------------------------- {quote}Regarding the code snippet I posted earlier, about writing the UserComment field. I had to do quite a bit of manual work to ensure adhering to the Exif specification. Should some of this perhaps be incorporated into the library?{quote} I am not sure when/where users would want to use it, but only because I am slowly understanding the code base, and for TIFF/EXIF, I don't really have much practical use (my use case is more properly handling images for IIIF, and in getting a release of Imaging out of the door so I can experiment imaging with Cantaloupe image server). But I assume it would be a different issue? If you could create a new issue, explaining the use case for that, and where you think it should go in Imaging, I'd be more than happy to review it. Thanks Joakim!!! Bruno > Imaging (Apache Sanselan) produces "odd offsets" in (EXIF) metadata > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IMAGING-205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAGING-205 > Project: Commons Imaging > Issue Type: Bug > Components: imaging.* > Reporter: Joakim Knudsen > Assignee: Bruno P. Kinoshita > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.0 > > Attachments: 20171030_214812.jpg, 20171030_214812_copy_desktop.JPG, 20171030_21481_COPY.jpg, DSC_3338.JPG, DSC_3338_imaging_205.JPG, DSC_3338_imaging_205_UC.JPG, DSC_5506.JPG, DSC_5506_copy_desktop.JPG, Gaboxjellyfish-changedexifmetadata.jpg, Gaboxjellyfish.jpg, Samsung Note 8 Android.jpg, after.html, before.html > > > I'm using the "last stable version" of Apache Sanselan 0.97 in an Android project (app). I have not upgraded to Commons Imaging yet, since the website says there is no stable release yet. Meanwhile, there are bugs in Sanselan. > If I run the [sample code method WriteExifMetadataExample.changeExifMetadata|http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/sanselan/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/sanselan/sampleUsage/WriteExifMetadataExample.java?p=820841] on an image, which updates the Apterture and GPS tags, the resulting image fails to validate (through Phil Harvey's [ExifTool software|https://sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/]): > {noformat} > > exiftool.exe -validate -error -warning -a "..\20171030_21481_COPY.jpg" > Validate : 19 Warnings (17 minor) > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for IFD0 tag 0x010f > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for IFD0 tag 0x011a > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for IFD0 tag 0x011b > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for IFD0 tag 0x0131 > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for IFD0 tag 0x0132 > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for ExifIFD tag 0x829a > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for ExifIFD tag 0x829d > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for ExifIFD tag 0x9003 > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for ExifIFD tag 0x9004 > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for ExifIFD tag 0x9202 > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for ExifIFD tag 0x9205 > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for ExifIFD tag 0x920a > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for ExifIFD tag 0x9286 > Warning : Non-standard count (1) for GPS tag 0x0001 GPSLatitudeRef > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for GPS tag 0x0002 > Warning : Non-standard count (1) for GPS tag 0x0003 GPSLongitudeRef > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for GPS tag 0x0004 > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for IFD1 tag 0x011a > Warning : [minor] Odd offset for IFD1 tag 0x011b > {noformat} > I need some advice on how to proceed here. Since Sanselan does not appear to do what it should (even on very basic metadata editing), am I correct to assume that the current version of Commons Imaging does a better job? :-) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)