Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A760200D37 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:03:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 57D1A160C03; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F7201609E5 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:03:03 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 86745 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2017 16:03:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 86734 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2017 16:03:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:03:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C1EBF1A3BBC for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:03:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebpMcgEDv2vF for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id CF5CF61414 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 79478E0BCB for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3427C240CE for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:03:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Shubham Jindal (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (MATH-1435) Implement cKMeans as a clustering algorithm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:03:04 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shubham Jindal updated MATH-1435: --------------------------------- Description: cKMeans implementation has been described here https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Ckmeans.1d.dp/index.html and https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2011-2/RJournal_2011-2_Wang+Song.pdf The algorithm described here is O(kn^2) where k: number of clusters and n: number of 1D points. But, there exists an efficient implementation in later versions of cKMeans which is O(knlogn) cKMeans is faster than kMeans and also deterministic in nature. It is supposed to be one of the best clustering algorithms for clustering 1D points was: cKMeans implementation has been described here https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Ckmeans.1d.dp/index.html and https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2011-2/RJournal_2011-2_Wang+Song.pdf The algorithm described here is O(kn^2) where k: number of clusters and n: number of 1D points. But, there exists an efficient implementation in later versions of cKMeans which is O(knlogn) cKMeans is faster than kMeans and also deterministic in nature. cKMeans is supposed to be one of the best clustering algorithms for clustering 1D points > Implement cKMeans as a clustering algorithm > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: MATH-1435 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1435 > Project: Commons Math > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Shubham Jindal > > cKMeans implementation has been described here > https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Ckmeans.1d.dp/index.html and https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2011-2/RJournal_2011-2_Wang+Song.pdf > The algorithm described here is O(kn^2) where k: number of clusters and n: number of 1D points. But, there exists an efficient implementation in later versions of cKMeans which is O(knlogn) > cKMeans is faster than kMeans and also deterministic in nature. It is supposed to be one of the best clustering algorithms for clustering 1D points -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)