Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:59:00 +0000 (UTC)
From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@commons.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.13016103.1477650651000.246097.1510761540150@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.13016103.1477650651000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.13016103.1477650651000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.13016103.1477650651081@jira-lw-us.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (COMMONSRDF-49) Make AbstractRDFParser
 serializable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:59:05 -0000


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16253687#comment-16253687 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on COMMONSRDF-49:
------------------------------------------

Github user wikier commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/43
  
    Having a little understanding on the concrete use case behind this PR, generally speaking I normally prefer having the factories/builders implementing `Serializable`. So in this concrete case I probably agree that the parser doesn't need that configuration. But again, I lack the background that motivated this request. Maybe having @ansell clarifying [`COMMONSRDF-49`](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-49) may help to lead to a conclusion.
    
    So, regarding the ongoing `0.5.0` release, I think it'd be better to keep this out of `RC2`, refine the requirements, and then reach an agreement that could be shipped in a future release.


> Make AbstractRDFParser serializable
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COMMONSRDF-49
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-49
>             Project: Apache Commons RDF
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: simple
>    Affects Versions: 0.3.0
>            Reporter: Stian Soiland-Reyes
>            Assignee: Stian Soiland-Reyes
>              Labels: parser
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>
> Raised by [~p_ansell] in [pull request 25|(https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/pull/25#discussion_r85436754]
> {quote}
> The use of optional here as a field type makes it impossible to serialise. Need to have the raw values stored in fields if you want to support serialisation in the future, which should otherwise be possible.
> {quote}
> The suggestion is to avoid {{Optional}} in the private fields of {{AbstractRDFParser}} so it can be serialized - it can still be {{Optional}} in the accessor methods.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)