Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B76200CBB for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:03:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D8640160BFD; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 07:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B75B160BE1 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:03:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 46787 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2017 07:03:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 46764 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2017 07:03:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 07:03:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 862BCD08D6 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 07:03:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.211 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1VWBER1eJ2X for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 07:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 982145FDBF for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 07:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B20B8E0D3C for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 07:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1F17A24608 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 07:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 07:03:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (COMPRESS-416) Tests failing under jdk 9 : one reflection issue, one change to ZipEntry related issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 07:03:05 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16073213#comment-16073213 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on COMPRESS-416: ----------------------------------------- I'm currently looking into the test failures (I only get one locally, so it seems to depend on the time zone). > Tests failing under jdk 9 : one reflection issue, one change to ZipEntry related issue > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: COMPRESS-416 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-416 > Project: Commons Compress > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.14, 1.15 > Environment: JDK 9 ( jdk9 tree tip - I believe this is what will be the RC, or if not, what would have been RC). > java.runtime.version = 9-internal+0-adhoc.ses.jdk9 > java.specification.version = 9 > java.version = 9-internal > java.vm.specification.version = 9 > os.arch = amd64 > os.name = Linux > os.version = 4.4.0-81-generic > Reporter: Simon Spero > Fix For: 1.15 > > Attachments: surefire-reports.zip > > > X5455_ExtendedTimestampTest is failing under JDK 9 , due to what appears to be a bogus value returned from getTime(). It seems like the test failure might be due to the changes introduced for this: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073497 > Tests were run using intelliJ TestRunner, using the openjdk9 build from the tip of the jdk9 tree (not dev). I believe that this is at most one commit away from what will be the RC (which was delayed at the last minute due to two issues, one of which was javadoc related, and the other hotspot. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)