Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6A9200CD7 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:57:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6BC4C160BDA; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A01DB160BF5 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:57:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 28775 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2017 17:57:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 28741 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2017 17:57:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 35B17CF88B for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.011 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s42pYWKZIKem for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id C30D65F6C0 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 596DEE0637 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 16F042411C for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Wei (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (JEXL-226) add ?? operator support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:05 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16063512#comment-16063512 ] Min Wei commented on JEXL-226: ------------------------------ I have some internal use cases to prefer the C# like syntax. On thinking of it, it might be a good idea to be able to redefine the operators in general for a scripting language like JEXL. Because it's a DSL after all. > add ?? operator support > ------------------------ > > Key: JEXL-226 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-226 > Project: Commons JEXL > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: Later > Reporter: Min Wei > Labels: features > Fix For: Later > > Original Estimate: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 1h > > Jexl already supports null-coalescing semantics with the operator "?:". So it should be a simple matter to extend it with a different syntax. > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/operators/null-conditional-operator > https://github.com/apache/commons-jexl/pull/4 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)