commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Vandahl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (JCS-119) replace synchronized blocks by java locks or concurrenhashmap
Date Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:01:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15762004#comment-15762004
] 

Thomas Vandahl commented on JCS-119:
------------------------------------

Thank you, Ben. Do you happen to have a CLA on file?

> replace synchronized blocks by java locks or concurrenhashmap
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCS-119
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-119
>             Project: Commons JCS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
>             Fix For: jcs-2.1
>
>
> A cache is typically used in a concurrent environment. Since Java 6 using a ReentrantLock
is faster than synchronized so can be interesting to replace synchronized blocks by a lock.
> Places i'm thinking about:
> * CompositeCache
> * AbstractDoubleLinkedListMemoryCache
> * LHMLRUMemoryCache
> * DoubleLinkedList
> * LRUMap
> * SingleLinkedList
> * SortedPreferentialArray
> Some places where replacing a HashMap by a ConcurrentHashMap can allow to get rid of
synchronized without needing a lock:
> * CacheEventQueue
> * AbstractDiskCache
> * CacheWatchRepairable
> There are other places but this is the main I saw.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message