commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LANG-1269) Wrong name or result of StringUtils::getJaroWinklerDistance
Date Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:13:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15597837#comment-15597837
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1269:
--------------------------------------

Github user coveralls commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/198
  
    
    [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/8459485/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/8459485)
    
    Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 93.57% when pulling **436d2801899827a2651b8b44d680aaf9e17acca7
on PascalSchumacher:jarowinklerdistance_name** into **8274993e293a79fc75829df398233915a6387a4b
on apache:master**.



> Wrong name or result of StringUtils::getJaroWinklerDistance
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-1269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1269
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.3, 3.4
>            Reporter: Jan Martin Keil
>            Assignee: Bruno P. Kinoshita
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The name of the method StringUtils::getJaroWinklerDistance is misleading.
> Currently for equal strings {{1}} is returned, for completely different strings {{0}}
is returned. That is a measure of similarity, not of a distance. A distance must be {{0}}
for equal strings. I read on the issues LANG-591 and LANG-944, that it was decided to have
a similar name to StringUtils::getLevenshteinDistance, but that requires also the change of
the methods result.
> Could you please (1) rename the method to StringUtils::getJaroWinklerSimilarity or (2)
change the method to return {{1 - currentResult}}?
> First option has the disadvantage to lose the similar naming of the similar methods,
second option implies the risk to unnoticed introduce bugs in depending code. So I think it
is preferable to use the first option.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message