Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 23:15:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Artem Barger (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@commons.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12996117.1470784300000.266809.1470784520676@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12996117.1470784300000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12996117.1470784300000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.12996117.1470784300933@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (RNG-4) Add benchmark to compare performance of
 generating a sequence of number values.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 23:15:22 -0000


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Artem Barger updated RNG-4:
---------------------------
    Attachment: RNG-4.patch

Refactor a bit {{ComputePiTestPerformance}} to allow flexibility and reuse of relevant parts in other *benchmarks*. Added benchmarks to compare different random generation for number of already defined  sources.

> Add benchmark to compare performance of generating a sequence of number values.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RNG-4
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-4
>             Project: Commons RNG
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Artem Barger
>         Attachments: RNG-4.patch
>
>
> There is a set on random source providers implemented in the project, here I'd like to suggest creating a benchmark to actually provide such an experiment. 
> Once having such test everybody will be able to compare and pick more suitable for use case.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)