[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:commenttabpanel&focusedCommentId=15151087#comment15151087
]
Eric Barnhill commented on MATH1325:

Is this code ndimensional, and if not, what are the limitations in terms of dimension?
> Improve finite differencing infrastructure
> 
>
> Key: MATH1325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH1325
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Fran Lattanzio
> Priority: Minor
>
> The existing finite difference framework in commons math is a limiting because it accepts
only fixed bandwidth parameters. Furthermore, the finite difference coefficients/descriptions
are not exposed to the user in any reasonable fashion (e.g. a user doing a numerical ODE solve
probably wants to just grab suitable coefficients from somewhere).
> Conceptually, I think the work of finite difference can be broadly divided into three
tasks:
> 1. Generation of finite difference coefficients. Again, one should be able to do this
and get the results outside of the context of taking an actual derivative. Ideally, we could
generate coefficients for any flavor (forward, central, backward) and order.
> 2. Selection of the bandwidth. This is, to be honest, the trickiest part of computing
a numerical derivative. There is some "art" to picking a proper bandwidth that will generate
an accurate numerical derivative  there are two competing sources of error (roundoff, due
to the finite representation of floating points; and truncation, due to the inherent nature
of finite differences). Ideally, we want to pick a bandwidth that will minimize the *total*
error.
> 3. Actually computing the finite difference derivative estimate. This is really easy
once you have 1. and 2.
> 4. Extend 13 to include support for multivariate finite differences.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
