commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernd Hopp (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (IO-468) Avoid allocating memory for method internal buffers, use threadlocal memory instead
Date Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:55:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14312248#comment-14312248
] 

Bernd Hopp commented on IO-468:
-------------------------------

So the "compromise" I made was to use WeakReference? And your point is what? I introduced
WRs to get rid of the 'memory could get through the roof'-argument, although no one was able
to show me any data suggesting that memory could be a problem. Now you come along and claim
 that I have to 'make compromises to the usecase'. So what do you wanna tell me? How would
static buffers be helpful? You understand that the problem is thread synchronization, do you?





> Avoid allocating memory for method internal buffers, use threadlocal memory instead
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IO-468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-468
>             Project: Commons IO
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Utilities
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>         Environment: all environments
>            Reporter: Bernd Hopp
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newbie, performance
>             Fix For: 2.5
>
>         Attachments: PerfTest.java, monitoring_with_threadlocals.png, monitoring_without_threadlocals.png,
performancetest.ods, performancetest_weakreference.ods
>
>   Original Estimate: 12h
>  Remaining Estimate: 12h
>
> In a lot of places, we allocate new buffers dynamically via new byte[]. This is a performance
drawback since many of these allocations could be avoided if we would use threadlocal buffers
that can be reused. For example, consider the following code from IOUtils.java, ln 2177:
> return copyLarge(input, output, inputOffset, length, new byte[DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE]);
> This code allocates new memory for every copy-process, that is not used outside of the
method and could easily and safely reused, as long as is is thread-local. So instead of allocating
new memory, a new utility-class could provide a thread-local bytearray like this:
> byte[] buffer = ThreadLocalByteArray.ofSize(DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE);
> return copyLarge(input, output, inputOffset, length, buffer);
> I have not measured the performance-benefits yet, but I would expect them to be significant,
especially when the streams itself are not the performance bottleneck. 
> Git PR is at https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/6/files



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message