commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benedikt Ritter (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LANG-909) Thread-safe wrapper for SimpleDateFormat
Date Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:16:52 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13868766#comment-13868766
] 

Benedikt Ritter commented on LANG-909:
--------------------------------------

I'm expecting that we will roll out at least 3.3 before making the move to 4.0 (and Java 8).
What I don't understand is, do we really need this or is FastDateParser enough? Would be nice
to have test that fails with FastDateParser but works with the ThreadSafeSimpleDateFormat.

> Thread-safe wrapper for SimpleDateFormat
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-909
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-909
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: lang.time.*
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Dmitry Katsubo
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Review Patch
>
>         Attachments: DateFormatAdapter.java, ThreadSafeSimpleDateFormat.java, ThreadSafeSimpleDateFormatTest.java
>
>
> {{SimpleDateFormat}} implementation in JDK is known to be [not thread-safe|http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6840803/simpledateformat-thread-safety].
The attached helper class solves the problem by holding a separate instance of {{SimpleDateFormat}}
per thread.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message