Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 609F510B4D for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85847 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2013 14:40:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-issues-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 85498 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2013 14:40:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: issues@commons.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 85485 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2013 14:40:51 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:40:51 +0000 Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:40:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Maurizio Cucchiara (JIRA)" To: issues@commons.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OGNL-189) Allow user to choose his preferred cache implementation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13859503#comment-13859503 ] Maurizio Cucchiara commented on OGNL-189: ----------------------------------------- Hi [~lukaszlenart], there is no mechanism implemented to customise the cache implementation AFAIK. The [internal package|http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-ognl/apidocs/index.html?org/apache/commons/ognl/internal/entry/CacheEntry.html] should contain all the cache implementation. I remember that at that time, I thought that the best approach was to use an property file, but maybe there is a best way to achieve that. > Allow user to choose his preferred cache implementation > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OGNL-189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-189 > Project: Commons OGNL > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Maurizio Cucchiara > Assignee: Maurizio Cucchiara > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.0 > > > At the moment, OGNL provides 4 different kind of cache implementation. > After some performance tests I realized that there is no the best approach: the efficiency depending strongly on the use of the cache itself. > Hence give the freedom of choice should be a good thing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)