commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sebb (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Created] (COLLECTIONS-473) AbstractCollectionDecorator.decorated() should not be used internally
Date Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:18:21 GMT
Sebb created COLLECTIONS-473:

             Summary: AbstractCollectionDecorator.decorated() should not be used internally
                 Key: COLLECTIONS-473
             Project: Commons Collections
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Sebb

AbstractCollectionDecorator.decorated() is used internally to access the collection.
However, the method is not final, so subclasses could override it.

Yet the field is also exposed (protected).

This is inconsistent.

Is there any use-case for overriding the collection to use a different one?
If so, having direct access as well is likely to cause problems.

I think it would be better to use the field directly internally.
The class Javadoc says the calls are forwarded to the underlying collection, but that is not
strictly true if decorated() is overridden.

If it is intended to allow this to be overridden, then the field needs to be protected against
arbitrary read/write access.

The field should probably be made private with a setter for use by deserialization only.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message