commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sebb (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (COLLECTIONS-461) splitmap.TransformedMap is not really a Map
Date Mon, 13 May 2013 23:43:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13656536#comment-13656536
] 

Sebb commented on COLLECTIONS-461:
----------------------------------

bq.  Is the issue that TransformedMap is still named *Map?

No, the problem here is that the "real" Map classes are compromised because Put#put(K, V)
returns Object rather than V.
The Put interface is not exactly the same as the "write" subset of java.util.Map.
                
> splitmap.TransformedMap is not really a Map
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COLLECTIONS-461
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-461
>             Project: Commons Collections
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sebb
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> splitmap.TransformedMap is part of the Get/Put hierarchy, but it does not behave like
a proper Java Map. 
> In particular, java.util.Map.put(K, V) returns V.
> However the collections Put interface returns Object.
> As far as I can tell, this was done in order to be able to include TransformedMap in
the hiearchy. But the side effect is to break the generics for all the non-transformer maps
in the hierarchy.
> Maybe there should be a separate PutTransformed interface which has the appropriate generic
types, i.e.
> public T put(K key, V value)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message