commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gilles (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (MATH-899) A random crash of MersenneTwister random generator
Date Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:44:58 GMT


Gilles commented on MATH-899:

bq. it would be sufficient to do a proof by induction (sort of): [...]

Well, this could be said for any piece of code: we must have property <x>, so we write
code that implements <x>. ;)
We write unit tests that actually show that the code behaves as expected.

After spending quite some time on the attached code, I of course agree that it is complicated
in some situations. In this case, the code is simple enough as to not necessitates a unit
But the issue will crop up again if we start introducing more "complicated" code (like the
utilities in the "java.util.concurrent" package).

So do I commit just the class and no unit test, or just the unit test of the synchronizing

> A random crash of MersenneTwister random generator
> --------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: MATH-899
>                 URL:
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>         Environment: Windows 7, JDK 1.7.05
>            Reporter: Alexander Nozik
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments:,
> There is a very small probability that MersenneTwister generator gives a following error:

> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 624
> in line 253
> The error is completely random and its probability is about 1e-8.
> UPD: The problem most probably arises only in multy-thread mode.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message