commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (MATH-894) Spurious method call in "ResizableDoubleArray" ("o.a.c.m.util")
Date Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:58:13 GMT


Phil Steitz commented on MATH-894:

I am sorry but I just realized (thanks to the unit test :) that there is a downside to this
change as it changes the contract of clear.  The removed reallocation shrunk the internal
array back to initialCapacity in size, as stated in the javadoc.  Removing the reallocation
leaves the internal array at whatever size it was when clear was invoked.  I can imagine usages
where after expanding an array to be large, someone might want to free the associated storage
and shrink the array back to the initial capacity, which clear would do before this change.
 Could be no one depends on / cares about this; but if we leave this change in, we should
remove the statement about restoring the size from the javadoc.
> Spurious method call in "ResizableDoubleArray" ("o.a.c.m.util")
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: MATH-894
>                 URL:
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Gilles
>            Assignee: Gilles
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1
> Method "addElement" should not call "contract()", as it will almost always make the storage
array shrink on the first call since it will be considered "too big" (for just storing one
> See discussion about this change in MATH-757.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message