[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:commenttabpanel&focusedCommentId=13486971#comment13486971
]
Gilles commented on MATH878:

In fact, I thought (misread) that it was the "TestUtils" class from the "test" part of the
repository.
We might think of making that name (from "main" part, I mean) less ambiguous (e.g. something
like "StatisticTestsUtils").
Still, two commits are always clearer, if they can be made independently. No? ;)
If you find that one is fine, no problem for me.
> GTest (LogLikelihood ratio  LLR test) in math.stat.inference
> 
>
> Key: MATH878
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH878
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 4.0
> Environment: Netbeans
> Reporter: Radoslav Tsvetkov
> Labels: features, test
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: MATH878_gTest_12102012.patch, MATH878_gTest_15102012.patch, MATH878_gTest_26102012.patch,
vcsdiff16294.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> 1. Implementation of GTest (LogLikelihood ratio LLR test for independence and goodnesoffit)
> 2. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gtest
> 3. ReasonsUsefulness: Gtests are tests are increasingly being used in situations where
chisquared tests were previously recommended.
> The approximation to the theoretical chisquared distribution for the Gtest is better
than for the Pearson chisquared tests. In cases where Observed >2*Expected for some cell
case, the Gtest is always better than the chisquared test.
> For testing goodnessoffit the Gtest is infinitely more efficient than the chi squared
test in the sense of Bahadur, but the two tests are equally efficient in the sense of Pitman
or in the sense of Hodge and Lehman.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
