commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Gillam (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LANG-769) Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
Date Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:04:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13482741#comment-13482741
] 

Steve Gillam commented on LANG-769:
-----------------------------------

Disambiguation/Accuracy of the semantic (and, thus, its name) is key here - otherwise it will
quickly lose it's worth and become a valid candidate for disappearing again (as any such should
be).

Whilst Not(Un)Implemented is the most often created it does not communicate the semantic well
and could well be confused with the permanent decision not to implement an optionalAPI call.

It somehow needs to represent itself (and, thus, the response (human/systemic) as being a
function of the development lifecycle ('You told me you'd finished!'). Perhaps others cleverer
than I can propose a succinct representation?

Obviously it needs to be a subclass of RuntimeException so we don't have to run around polluting
'completed' code with throws clauses :)
                
> Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-769
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: lang.exception.*
>            Reporter: david cogen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the version
2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard exception classes by providing
a more semantically rich description of the problem."
> Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the library; not just
internal use within commons-lang.
> I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both commons-lang and commons-lang3
(but I really don't to do that). It would be very nice to have these back.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message