commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gary Gregory (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LANG-769) Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
Date Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:46:12 GMT


Gary Gregory commented on LANG-769:

Interesting, NotImplementedException could mean, "not yet" or "not ever". So expressing the
intention in the positive could help: {{ToDoException}}, {{ToBeImplementedException}}, and
the like. I could see usage like {{throw new ToDoException("LANG-987");}}
> Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LANG-769
>                 URL:
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: lang.exception.*
>            Reporter: david cogen
>            Priority: Minor
> Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the version
2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard exception classes by providing
a more semantically rich description of the problem."
> Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the library; not just
internal use within commons-lang.
> I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both commons-lang and commons-lang3
(but I really don't to do that). It would be very nice to have these back.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message