commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (MATH-859) Fix and then deprecate isSupportXxxInclusive in RealDistribution interface
Date Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:17:07 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Phil Steitz updated MATH-859:
-----------------------------

    Description: 
The conclusion from [1] was never implemented. We should deprecate these
properties from the RealDistribution interface, but since removal
will have to wait until 4.0, we should agree on a precise
definition and fix the code to match it in the mean time.

The definition that I propose is that isSupportXxxInclusive means
that when the density function is applied to the upper or lower
bound of support returned by getSupportXxxBound, a finite (i.e. not
infinite), not NaN value is returned.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/dxuxh7eybl7xejde


  was:
he conclusion from [1] was never implemented. We should deprecate these
properties from the RealDistribution interface, but since removal
will have to wait until 4.0, we should agree on a precise
definition and fix the code to match it in the mean time.

The definition that I propose is that isSupportXxxInclusive means
that when the density function is applied to the upper or lower
bound of support returned by getSupportXxxBound, a finite (i.e. not
infinite), not NaN value is returned.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/dxuxh7eybl7xejde


    
> Fix and then deprecate isSupportXxxInclusive in RealDistribution interface
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-859
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-859
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Phil Steitz
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> The conclusion from [1] was never implemented. We should deprecate these
> properties from the RealDistribution interface, but since removal
> will have to wait until 4.0, we should agree on a precise
> definition and fix the code to match it in the mean time.
> The definition that I propose is that isSupportXxxInclusive means
> that when the density function is applied to the upper or lower
> bound of support returned by getSupportXxxBound, a finite (i.e. not
> infinite), not NaN value is returned.
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/dxuxh7eybl7xejde

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message