commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Carman (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (PROXY-18) Invocation should return the proxy object, rather than the target, from #getProxy()
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:49:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROXY-18?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13459511#comment-13459511
] 

James Carman commented on PROXY-18:
-----------------------------------

It has been so long since I've been in this code.  I can't recall why I structured the unit
tests to specifically look for this behavior.  If it doesn't make sense, let's change it.
 Good catch!  
                
> Invocation should return the proxy object, rather than the target, from #getProxy()
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PROXY-18
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROXY-18
>             Project: Commons Proxy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: Matt Benson
>         Attachments: PROXY-18.patch.txt
>
>
> 1. It's nobody's business but the proxy's creator what the target object is.
> 2. Unless the proxy instance is available, e.g. fluent interfaces cannot be properly
proxied.
> It's possible that _both_ the {{target}} and {{proxy}} objects could be provided by the
{{Invocation}} but as already stated I find that neither necessary nor desirable.  I'll be
attaching a patch for community review.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message