commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sebb (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (NET-463) Does it make sense for NET classes to be Serializable?
Date Sat, 05 May 2012 17:05:50 GMT
Sebb created NET-463:
------------------------

             Summary: Does it make sense for NET classes to be Serializable?
                 Key: NET-463
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-463
             Project: Commons Net
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Sebb


A few of the NET classes currently implement Serializable.

However, it's doubtful that serialization would actually work.
There are no unit tests.

Also, what is the use-case for it?

Can we drop the Serializable references?

The classes that implement Serializable currently are:
ftp.FTPFile
ntp.TimeStamp
util.ListenerList (contains non-serialisable field of type CopyOnWriteArrayList)
ProtocolCommandSupport


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message